There are pros and cons for both. For instance, if your institution restructures, then there may be difficulties with the feed in the longer term.
Mainly institutions would use a mainstream ‘catch all’ feed with everything included under the ‘institution as provider’ heading. However, if there are specifically distinct course providers within your institution, such as ‘staff development’ or ‘business-related’ offerings then it might make more sense to split the feed and make separate provider elements for a separate faculty - then link via facilities inside XCRI-CAP.
The East Midlands projects mainly used the provider and its UKPRN code for their main XCRI-CAP feed.
The sixteenth issue of the Course Data Programme Stage 2... Read more
The sixteenth issue of the Course Data Programme Stage 2... Read more
The fifteenth issue of the Course Data Programme Stage 2... Read more
The fourteenth issue of the Course Data Programme Stage 2... Read more
The thirteenth issue of the Course Data Programme Stage 2... Read more
The twelfth issue of the Course Data Programme Stage 2... Read more
The eleventh issue of the Course Data Programme Stage 2... Read more
The KIS data has now been launched. Data from all... Read more
The tenth issue of the Course Data Programme Stage 2... Read more
The ninth issue of the Course Data Programme Stage 2... Read more
Congratulations to all those who have been successful in their... Read more
The eigth issue of the Course Data Programme Stage 2... Read more